Four of the largest ISPs--AOL, Earthlink, Microsoft/MSN, and Yahoo!--agreed this week to work together on technology to stop spam. The agreement puts at least a temporary halt to the development of the companies' competing antispam technologies. Instead, as part of the new Anti-Spam Technical Alliance (ASTA), the ISPs will collaborate and pool their resources to battle spam.
"Industry self-regulation is an important component to solving the problem [of spam]," Ryan Hamlin, general manager of Microsoft's Anti-Spam Technology & Strategy Team, said. "We're four fierce competitors getting together today and saying we have one common enemy--the spammer."
In the past, each of these companies pushed different antispam technologies, although AOL, Earthlink, and Microsoft agreed last month to pool their approaches. Now, these three companies will work with Yahoo! on a single standard called Sender ID (Caller ID for E-Mail was Microsoft's approach). After the four companies roll out Sender ID, they'll evaluate a second form of spam protection called DomainKeys, which Yahoo! originally proposed. DomainKeys uses cryptography technologies to establish whether an email sender's identity is valid.
ASTA hopes that other email suppliers will follow suit and adopt the Sender ID and DomainKeys technologies, specifically, and also spend time examining their networks for zombie applications that can send bulk mail to unsuspecting victims. Between 40 percent and 90 percent of all spam is sent from zombie-infected computers, according to AOL and Microsoft.
Identity theft is the single biggest spam problem. After spoofing legitimate users' email addresses, malicious spammers send email messages that appear to be from the legitimate users but direct victims to so-called phishing Web sites, which resemble genuine company Web sites. The victims are duped into providing private personal data, such as credit card numbers. "The biggest thing we can do to reduce spam is [to implement] sender authentication," Brian Sullivan, senior director of AOL's Mail Operations, said.
End of Article
Yay! Now, if only they would all practice what they preach.
I agree with the idea of shutting off people whose computers have become spam zombies. I could go and make a generalization that it's just some old people, but I see too many idiots buying and using computers all the time. And of course, they will complain that they didnt know, and that it's not their fault that they are incompetent users.
In the end, someone will decide to sue microsoft and it will all somewhow end up being Microsoft's fault. It would be more profitable for Microsoft to sue users for being incompetent. ;)
Cluster continuous replication and Volume Shadow Copy Service might have made backups unnecessary in Exchange 2007, but will admins feel comfortable without a dedicated backup solution in place? ...
At Microsoft's annual shareholder meeting this week, CEO Steve Ballmer emphatically closed the door on the possibility that his company was interested in purchasing ailing Internet giant Yahoo!. His frank assessment of the situation sent Yahoo!'s stock ...
Order Your SQL Fundamentals CD Today! Learn how to use SQL Server, understand Office integration techniques and dive into the essentials of SQL Express and Visual Basic with this free SQL Fundamentals CD.
You've Deployed SharePoint...Now What? This one-day free online conference delivers the technical knowledge needed to kick MOSS up a notch. In one information-packed day, independent SharePoint experts will present practical, real-world information and provide take-away, ready-to-use solutions
What Would You Do If You Ran Microsoft? ITTV's 2008 inaugural video contest, "If I Ran Microsoft..." is your chance to tell it like it is. Be goofy or be serious, but don"t miss this chance to have fun, win prizes, and go viral in a major way.
Maximize Your SharePoint Investment This web seminar discusses how true bi-directional replication of SharePoint content from one server to another enables branch offices to maintain access to current SharePoint content.
I agree with the idea of shutting off people whose computers have become spam zombies. I could go and make a generalization that it's just some old people, but I see too many idiots buying and using computers all the time. And of course, they will complain that they didnt know, and that it's not their fault that they are incompetent users.
In the end, someone will decide to sue microsoft and it will all somewhow end up being Microsoft's fault. It would be more profitable for Microsoft to sue users for being incompetent. ;)
Sanel June 23, 2004